Amsterdam (1889) – 365 vs CG comparison

If this is unfamiliar please find a previous example in the blog:

Five games were found with differences, plus <CG> is missing two stubs (one missing game + one forfeit)


==========================================================================
Amsterdam (1889)
==========================================================================
365 vs CG - i.e. 365 first, CG second
----------------------------------------------------------------------

1889.08.26   A03  38     (R1)  1-0   Lasker -- Bauer

Tpos 6.Nf3, 7.Nc3;      CG is wrong (according to TB)

TB G-4 p17/25

CG is alone, wrong...  CB/365 both agree with 6.Nf3, etc.
                       (NIC is missing game).

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1026352
----------------------------------------------------------------------

1889.08.27   D11  72     (R3)  1-0   Burn -- Bauer

37...Rd7 vs 37...Rd2;     CG is right, 37...Rd2 is TB approved.

TB G-12 p32/40

CG is alone, right...  CB/NIC/365 all have 37...Rd7.

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1026351
----------------------------------------------------------------------

1889.08.28   C14  61     (R5)   =    Van Vliet -- Mason

Tpos 59...exd5+, 60...Rxd5;     CG is wrong (TB).

TB G-17 p45/54

CG is alone, wrong...  CB/NIC/365 all have 59...exd5+. Eval is same.

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1661580
----------------------------------------------------------------------

1889.08.30   A00  34     (R6)  0-1   Leather -- Mason

27.Rad1 vs 27.Rac1;    CG is wrong (TB)

TB G-22 p54/62

CG stands alone, wrong...  CB/NIC/365 all have 27.Rad1

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1661583
----------------------------------------------------------------------

1889.08.31   B46  36     (R8)   =    Van Foreest -- Van Vliet

35.Kf3 vs 35.Ke3;     CG is right (TB)

TB G-31 p73/81

CG stands alone, right...   CB/NIC/365 all have 35.Kf3 (eval ~equal)

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1661587
----------------------------------------------------------------------
                       

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s