London (1892) – 7th BCA Congress
12-player RR⁽¹⁾ March 7th – March 18th, 1892 at the rooms of the British Chess Club,
King Street, Covent Garden, London ENG.
Time Control⁽²⁾: 20 moves/hour, sealed envelope adjournments.
Playing sessions⁽³⁾: 1 game/day, 2:00 – 6:00 pm and 8:00-11:00 pm sessions.
Adjournment play done as play allowed.
Entrance Fee⁽⁴⁾: £2 / £2 deposit.
Prizes: £30, 20, 10, 5 (plus fees awarded to non-prize winners via S-B score)
Prize Winners: Lasker, Mason, Loman, ( Bird, Locock )
Special Prizes⁽⁵⁾: 2 guineas for brilliancy <1892.03.15 A03 49 (R8) 0-1 Bird — Lee>
Links: PGN, Wikipedia, EDO chess, CG Bistro – re: Gillam⁽⁶⁾, Game schedule, O’Keefe,
(1) There is no “official” tournament book for London – BCA (1892). Various contemporaneous sources (BCM, CPC, DSZ)
and O’Keefe (i.e. contemporaneous newspaper) sources were used.
(2) DSZ v47 N4 (Apr 1892) p126-127, also see Gillam. We are assuming sealed envelope adjournments are now standard.
(3) Ibid.
(4) BCM v12 n135 Mar 1892.
(5) Prize offered by “Scholastic Globe“.
(6) Some information originally provided by Gillam is discussed. Here is a link to a vendor of Gillam’s book – link.
From BCM v12 (Apr 1892) p148 comes this RR xtab, sorted by standing:
Here is the Z-base version for comparison:
Here are the SCID versions, sorted alphabetically, and then a Swiss xtab, sorted by standing:
RR:
London - BCA (1892) London ENG, 1892.03.07 - 1892.03.18 Age Nat Score 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1: Bird, Henry Edward 61 ENG 6.5 / 11 X 1 = 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 (+6 -4 =1) 2: Fenton, Richard 55 ENG 5.5 / 11 0 X 1 1 0 = 0 = = = 1 = (+3 -3 =5) 3: Gossip, George Hatfeild 50 ENG 2.5 / 11 = 0 X 0 0 1 0 0 0 = 0 = (+1 -7 =3) 4: Jasnogrodsky, Nicolai 32 USA 5.0 / 11 0 0 1 X 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 (+5 -6 =0) 5: Lasker, Emanuel 23 GER 9.0 / 11 0 1 1 1 X 1 = 1 1 = 1 1 (+8 -1 =2) 6: Lee, Francis Joseph 35 ENG 5.5 / 11 1 = 0 0 0 X = 1 = 1 0 1 (+4 -4 =3) 7: Locock, Charles Dealtry 6.5 / 11 0 1 1 0 = = X = = 1 1 = (+4 -2 =5) 8: Loman, Rudolf Johannes 30 NED 7.0 / 11 1 = 1 1 0 0 = X 0 1 1 1 (+6 -3 =2) 9: Mason, James 42 ENG 7.5 / 11 1 = 1 1 0 = = 1 X 0 1 1 (+6 -2 =3) 10: Mortimer, James 58 USA 3.5 / 11 0 = = 1 = 0 0 0 1 X 0 0 (+2 -6 =3) 11: Rumboll, Alfred 3.0 / 11 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 X 0 (+3 -8 =0) 12: Van Vliet, Louis 24 ENG 4.5 / 11 1 = = 0 0 0 = 0 0 1 1 X (+3 -5 =3) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 66 games: +32 =15 -19
Swiss:
London - BCA (1892) London ENG, 1892.03.07 - 1892.03.18 Age Nat Score 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1: Lasker, Emanuel 23 GER 9.0 / 11 3w+ 4b- 2w+ 6w+ 9b+ 8b+ 10w= 11w+ 12b+ 7b+ 5w= (+8 -1 =2) 2: Mason, James 42 ENG 7.5 / 11 8b+ 12b+ 1b- 7w= 4w+ 11w+ 6b= 5b= 9w+ 3w+ 10w- (+6 -2 =3) 3: Loman, Rudolf Johannes 30 NED 7.0 / 11 1b- 8b+ 6b- 12b+ 7w= 4w+ 5b= 10w+ 11w+ 2b- 9w+ (+6 -3 =2) 4: Bird, Henry Edward 61 ENG 6.5 / 11 9b- 1w+ 5w+ 10b+ 2b- 3b- 7w+ 6w- 8w+ 11b+ 12w= (+6 -4 =1) 5: Locock, Charles Dealtry 6.5 / 11 6w= 11w+ 4b- 8b- 12w+ 7b+ 3w= 2w= 10w+ 9w= 1b= (+4 -2 =5) 6: Lee, Francis Joseph 35 ENG 5.5 / 11 5b= 9w+ 3w+ 1b- 8b- 12b- 2w= 4b+ 7b= 10w+ 11w- (+4 -4 =3) 7: Fenton, Richard 55 ENG 5.5 / 11 11b+ 10b= 9b= 2b= 3b= 5w- 4b- 12w+ 6w= 1w- 8w+ (+3 -3 =5) 8: Jasnogrodsky, Nicolai 32 USA 5.0 / 11 2w- 3w- 10b- 5w+ 6w+ 1w- 11b+ 9w+ 4b- 12b+ 7b- (+5 -6 =0) 9: Van Vliet, Louis 24 ENG 4.5 / 11 4w+ 6b- 7w= 11b+ 1w- 10b+ 12w= 8b- 2b- 5b= 3b- (+3 -5 =3) 10: Mortimer, James 58 USA 3.5 / 11 12w= 7w= 8w+ 4w- 11b- 9w- 1b= 3b- 5b- 6b- 2b+ (+2 -6 =3) 11: Rumboll, Alfred 3.0 / 11 7w- 5b- 12w+ 9w- 10w+ 2b- 8w- 1b- 3b- 4w- 6b+ (+3 -8 =0) 12: Gossip, George Hatfeild 50 ENG 2.5 / 11 10b= 2w- 11b- 3w- 5b- 6w+ 9b= 7b- 1w- 8w- 4b= (+1 -7 =3) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 66 games: +32 =15 -19
If you reached this far, then you might just be interested in the “(and last)” parenthetical in the title. I’ve done almost 50 of the earliest international tournaments following Reichhelm’s “Fifty Tournaments”. During this survey, the BCA organization has played a major part in the shaping of play, working out the hiccups of the various experimental formats and rules adopted in the earliest days of play, until this version, run under essentially modern rules of play. So, it’s with a certain measure of sadness that I have to acknowledge this as the last major tournament organized and sponsored by the BCA. In fact, the organization was to disband before the year was out.
zz
Pingback: First Look – look here first | Zan Chess